Goldenarticles articles

Conception - discipline


CREATION OF Bring to life FROM INANIMATE: - We have touched upon some methodical dry wells and frauds already. The idea of cold fusion and perpetual activity that the Utah researchers may not have achieved was just dealt with: but a contemporary account viewing a Utah learner using Farnsworth's old designs is a different exemplar that makes me think Cold Fusion is going to be a reality. Chaos is the in use fact of the universe that does in point of fact adapt and conceive or alter all through qualitative and quantitative leaps according to the Russian (Check out the New Boundary ancestors who have a site on the web. ) and numinous methodical paradigm-thinking. Thus many of the customary behavioral observations can only describe part of the day to day 'reality'. A few decades ago discipline generated proteins from noticeable nonexistence and acknowledged they had bent life from inanimate. This belief and conduct experiment was moderately replicable and became touted and trained all over all schools, but it was less than what it was represented to be in the final analysis. NASA now pronounces there is life far and wide together with interstellar vacuums. Germs are not the only aim for this truth.

Just as there are archetypes in our minds the corresponding templates of awareness exist in the 'ether' or 'cosmic soup'. At once and inclusive of all awareness we get the Entire Mind or Vocal Convergence. These equipment are shallow metaphors of what exceedingly can be done with coupled endeavor of mind and soul by means of the attunement of adept practitioners and observers of nature. The Jewish 'Golem' is by all accounts able to invest the soul of a dead being into the fashioned earth and be of importance that the Rabbis or other magicians work with. The alchemist's 'homonunclus', and gargoyles being brought to life by Kafka: folklore be plentiful in many cultural settings. The leeway of such an act of construction is more mind-blowing to any rational anyone than even the focusing of dimensional forces. How could one in fact tap their genetic acquaintance to cause any form of life to exist. Yet it would arrive on the scene mere discipline can conceive some simple shop blocks and that energy can be bound for all the way through super conscious latticeworks that hold on to in a row much as the silicon mainframe chip or digitized quantum bits of cognized information. The one dimensional vocal armed forces of Filament Assumption that association to form membranes and other 11-dimensional realities are quite reminiscent of the concepts of animating and transmuting the form of affair (which is just lower level or dross energy).

The quantity of time that man has been aware and ingeniously paying attention on attunement is far longer than the time he has been fixed on power and background greed. It didn't demand characters it down. In fact it isn't very easy to account for how chaos or conception works by any scientist who can display the arithmetical formula. Yes, we see there are expressive metaphors and fancy terminologies. What the formula can do is still chiefly not proven in terms of what the evident aptitude might yield. Man is on the verge of being able to build and have robots to coin as self-replicants and reorganization of wood or other energy into food or gold. This is the estimated near expectations outcome with nanotechnology and 'replicators' much like the Star Trek descriptions have brought us for many years.

Bucky Fuller called it creative realization and said that no matter which we can dream up is feasible all the way through our acceptance and alert intention. He was aphorism it in dry and often controlled or even incomprehensible idiom but he is right. So we can say that 'survival of the fittest' is a rude accepted fact that 'creation' can alter and surpass. The antique ideals of Godheads and akashic or other as the crow flies cognition are worth exploration for the reason that the world of 'seems to be' is actually what ever we can create. With a bit of luck my naďve perception about RIGHT THOUGHT=RIGHT Battle from the laws of the Magi is an in use principle.

Did Mungo Man's line of humans go wrong? How much of these effects did they learn? Did they teach some of our kind to do some of these things? If 'fittest' can be conceived with a God-like Drive and there truly is an energy of all energy to complement and find the most creative claim (or happiness) then we are in for some fantastic voyages of splendiferous 'reality'! Can these descriptions of heaven on earth especially come about? Or will our ethical disquiet make sure old line greed overtakes a universe of possibilities. Skill by now gives a power to do many clothes which in the hands of a number of citizens generates a great deal of concern. Was it John Donne who said if one man suffers we all are diminished? The accepted ways that energy and its consciousness form and weave be of importance are the branch of learning of observers in art once again. Dr. Don Robbins is a solid state chemist whose work I truly appreciate. In the next excerpts from an critique upper-class 'Nanotubes for Electronics' from Dec. 2000's Controlled American entertain dream how these biologically in the works matter occur if there is no consciousness in matter, and consider the ancients did have lenses for telescopes and microscopes.

"Nearly 10 years ago Sumio Iijima, session at an electron microscope at the NEC Deep Examination Laboratory in Tsukaba, Japan, first noticed odd nanoscopic gear lying in a smear of soot. Made of pure carbon, as consistent and symmetric as crystals, these gracefully thin, excitingly long macromolecules soon became known as nanotubes {And even if the ancients didn't have passable microscopes the continuation of these fits with the skill of lattices and energy we can amount in Stonehenge and the kings chamber of the Great Pyramid. They were able to adjust with it. }, and they have been the aim of intense methodical study ever since.

Just recently, they have befit a area of interest for commerce as well. Many of the extraordinary properties attributed to nanotubes--among them, beyond compare resilience, tensile concentration and thermal stability--have fed fantastic predictions of minuscule robots, dent-resistant car bodies and earthquake-resistant buildings {The poured in place certain in Peru with diagonal rocks that 'fit' like the Great Pyramid?}. The first goods to use nanotubes, however, exploit none of these. As a replacement for the first applications are electrical. Some Broad Motors cars before now consist of artificial parts to which nanotubes were added; such artificial can be electrified at some point in painting so that the paint will stick more cheerfully {And be made downy and even by means of the use of a laser measuring application. }. And two nanotube-based lighting and demonstrate foodstuffs are well on their way to market.

In the long term, maybe the most advantageous applications will take added benefit of nanotubes' distinctive electronic properties. Carbon nanotubes can in code play the same role as silicon does in electronic circuits, but at a molecular scale where silicon and other banner semiconductors cease to work. Even if the electronics conscientiousness is previously almost the analytical dimensions of transistors in business chips below 200 nanometers (billionths of a meter)--about 400 atoms wide--engineers face large obstacles in lifelong this miniaturization. Contained by this decade, the equipment and processes on which the laptop revolution has been built will begin to hit deep animal limits. Still, there are huge financial incentives to contract campaign further, for the reason that the speed, density and efficiency of microelectronic diplomacy all rise fast as the least article size decreases. Experiments over the past numerous years have given researchers hope {Remember the bio-ram plans advent from Oak Ridges research, will meld wonderfully here. } that wires and functional plans tens of nanometers or lesser in size could be made from nanotubes and incorporated into electronic circuits that work nearer and on much less power than those free today.

The first carbon nanotubes that Iijima pragmatic back in 1991 were so-called multiwalled tubes: each controlled a amount of hollow cylinders of carbon atoms nested classified one a different like Russian dolls. Two years later Iijima and Donald Bethune of IBM as an individual fashioned single-walled nanotubes that were made of just one layer of carbon atoms. Both kinds of tubes are made in alike ways, and they have many analogous properties-- the most noticeable being that they are exceedingly narrow and long. The single-walled variety, for example, is about one nanometer in diameter but can run thousands of nanometers in length.

What makes these tubes so balanced is the depth with which carbon atoms bond to one another, which is also what makes rhombus so hard. In rhombus the carbon atoms link into four-sided tetrahedra, {Bucky Fuller's Synergistics gives complete insight into structures that has led to a new building block being named after him, the Fullerene. His icosahedra and the fact of the Pyramid having two completely created tetrahedra in it leads to concept of delta wave forms out of the cosmic energy. } but in nanotubes the atoms array themselves in hexagonal rings like chicken wire. One sees the same archetype in graphite, and in fact a nanotube looks like a sheet (or a number of stacked sheets) of graphite rolled into a picture perfect cylinder. It is not known for a variety of how the atoms in fact condense into tubes (see "Zap, Bake or Blast," on page 67), but it appears that they may grow by adding up atoms to their ends {Remember the appearance of palladium type noble metals from the entry on canker cures. It is also associated to telomeres which cap the DNA strands and are so crucial to stopping aging. }, much as a knitter adds stitches to a sport shirt sleeve.


However they form, the concerto and geometry of carbon nanotubes create a exclusive electronic complexity. That is in part basically the conclusion of size, since quantum physics governs at the nanometer scale {As Above, So Below-is the law of the magi that applies and make sense of chaos when fully appreciated, or as much as everybody can. }. But graphite itself is a very abnormal material. While most electrical conductors can be classified as both metals or semiconductors, graphite is one of the rare resources known as a semimetal {Calcium and brushite were used in some state of affairs we have mentioned. }, carefully balanced in the middle zone among the two. By combining graphite's semimetallic properties with the quantum rules of energy levels and electron waves, carbon nanotubes emerge as truly exotic conductors. {We will cover copper more in divining rods and the use of artless conductors, that ease with such effects as water. Pendulums are part of nature's antennae as well. The clause has an illustration or photo of a nanotube avenue and a analysis that says in part - "Electrically conductive macromolecules of carbon that self-assemble into tubes are being experienced as ultrafine wires and as channels in investigational field-effect transistors. "}

For example, one rule of the quantum world is that electrons act like waves as well as particles, and electron waves can buttress or cancel one a further {Thus more complete crystalline structures fashioned in space vacuum environment like Skylab, are truly able to affair with less chaos. }. As a consequence, an electron dispersal about a nanotube's boundary can entirely cancel itself out; thus, only electrons with just the right wavelength remain. " (8)

What can I say? There is so much to know and it is good to have the quantum world to tell us how a small amount we actually know, considerably than the constant certainty of other educational disciplines. Under the 'Zap, Bake or Blast divide of this clause they say a little that must allow the person who reads to make more sense of the 'heating and cooling' that were noted a propos the alchemists work, as well as the 'buckyballs' or Fullerenes that I mentioned in one of my continual interruptions that seek to integrate the acquaintance we are exploring.

"Sumio Iijima may have been the first to see a nanotube, but he was undoubtedly not the first to make one. In fact, Neanderthals may have made hardly visible quantities of nanotubes, unwittingly, in the fires that warmed their caves {What about Mungo Man? And Neanderthals worshipped in caves as much as anybody ever lived in them at these times. This is a new delicate case in point of our insensitive put down of prior humans. There are colonize dispossessed in cities existing under bridges who would love the confidence and comfort of a cenote. In fact, a cenote is a very spiritual place that at times has hot springs or cold streams. They are quite wonderful. In Xcaret, Mexico they have recreated a Mayan village exterior a coordination of these cenotes. This same place has porpoises you can ride and tells the story of how they came from the early wolf-like creatures of the land. }. Split by heat, carbon atoms recombine but they can in soot, some in fluid blobs but others in soccerball-shaped spheres called buckyballs or in long cylindrical capsules called buckytubes or nanotubes. " (9)

Bucky couldn't 'truck with' instruction and all the same they tried to make it easy for him after he had before now proven himself, he dropped out. His work as a educationalist at Princeton Academe brought him in touch with Einstein and the story of how Bucky's first book was available is a classic in publishing 'expert' myopia. The editor said he had shown his work to those who knew Einstein's assumption and they contracted Bucky didn't know what he was chatting about. Einstein intervened to point out to the publisher that Bucky was one of a handful who knew his work and that his insight was correct. His attunements and meditations produced many very central equipment and we all could be a lot more like him. I love Bucky! But, I certainly can't quote him very much since his 'teleologic' presentation and word usage is afar most people, SO I'm not astounded the editor and his 'experts' were SO befuddled.

"In 1814, with Michael Faraday {truly a great metaphysician and adjusted researcher who sensed the field of 'cosmic soup'. }, he analyzed rhombus by ignition and concluded that it was pure carbon. For the reason that graphite was also known to be pure carbon, this meant there were two types of carbon, each with assorted brute properties. Davy's discovery of the allotropy of carbon meant that graphite and lozenge existed in two assorted rock forms, even although this could not maybe be explained on the basis of Dalton's round atoms. By now, Davy was committed that there were actually many another kinds of atoms, other than Dalton's {An alchemist who had to fight adjacent to so-called hermeneuts while alive, in order to hide his own alchemical nature. }? Faraday was a poor boy who worked as a bookbinder's apprentice. . . In the long run Faraday far outshone Davy, which Davy on cause resented. " (10)

The description writers who Hellenized all data and are obtainable as if they open it all, like Thales (born to a Phoenician blood relation like Pythagoras); were able to make many later academics accept as true that only what survived in journalism was known. It is appropriate evident to many scholars that the comprehension curve that makes for such impulsive development in ideas is ridiculous; but all the same it is rare to pick up a book or critique where you don't see the cause indicating comprehension didn't exist until far later than communal sense and argue dictates. It will be harder to avow this psychosis now that we know how much more antiquated humans actually are. So we must appreciate this when we see Mr. Salzberg characters as a chemist or for the Element Company that they are business to the same history. It is good for citizens to see the Greeks tacit chaos and atomics to a a variety of extent, nonetheless. It is also crucial to bear in mind that secrets (including smelting and beforehand weapons-making because of meteorite hammering) were just about never described but among trusted allies or breed members.

"There were, of course, other theories, most notably the atomic conjecture of Leucippos (c. 440B. C. ) and Democritos (460-c. 370B. C. ), later custom-made by Epicouros (341-270B. C. ) and Lucretius (c. 95-55B. C. ). According to their atomic theory, there was only one substance {Such as the one-dimensional sung force of Chain Theory. }, the prime matter, which existed in the form of changeless, indestructible, inseparable atoms of atypical sizes and shapes, heartbreaking back and forth aimlessly with naught amid them, in bring about heartrending in a vacuum. " (11)

Autho of many books
World-Mysteries. com guest 'expert'
The ES Press Magazine columnist

This Week in Science  Science Magazine

News at a glance  Science

How to be an ethical scientist  Science Magazine

Productivity in a pandemic  Science Magazine

Building bridges  Science

Funding quandary  Science Magazine

Developed by:
home | site map © 2020