Goldenarticles articles

Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics of the maritime life and uses for ai, uavs, robotics, and the forthcoming - discipline


Air has 750 times less density as the oceans, yet so many of the same ideology apply there as well. We are quite accustomed with nautical life and the act abilities of sharks, dolphins, penguins, fish, alligators, etc. Mankind is quite fascinated by maritime life and often tries to use these observations to coin diplomacy to serve him.

A Great White Shark can swim 7 times as fast as the Olympic swimmers in Athens captivating the gold this year, yet it is not even close to being the highest in the water. Powerful, yes indeed, but the need for speed confines its abilities to catch some of its darling meals. Luckily humans are not one of them, as much as JAWS I, II and III would have you believe. The Great White Shark swims at about 25 mph. Squids can move by means of the water at 20 mph. The Blue Shark has been clocked in short bursts at 43 mph yet its be in the region of cruising speed in open water is connecting 17. 7 and 24. 5 mph. The Make Short Fin can pass through at 10 times its body duration per second, which is quite fast and amounts to over 46 mph at top speed. It can accelerate at 45 feet per second/ per second, earlier than a rock can fall or a human accelerates after he departs a entirely good jet in explore for an adrenaline rush to complete sense of purpose. A human can swim at 5. 04 mph, but only for short distances and you have to be a Mark Spitz or Michael Phelps to it for very long.

http://www. ncsu. edu/ligon/olympics/Spitz/MarkS. html

As good as these super star athletes are, they are no match for evolution, lacking modification. You might be happy to know that a barracuda will catch you and bite ahead of a great white shark will catch you in open water, they can swim at 27 mph, one of the fastest, well and hungriest fish in the water. Creature Sea Life is quite adapted; Sea Lion 25 mph, Customary Dolphin 24. 7, Gentoo Penguin 17, Blue Whale 29. 76, Container Nose Dolphin 17 mph. Many of the fish eaten by the nautical life of prey are also quite adapted for case in point the Calm Salmon can swim at 14 mph. Then there are the hasty fish, those, which leap out of the water and befit airborne, thus proving that there is a similarity amid the two realms. The fleeting fish flies at 35 mph and has been known to fly right into a boat, for an easy catch. The Leaping Albacore Tuna leaps at 40 mph great sushi no doubt, the Fair-haired Fin Tuna at 46. 35, the Sword Fish 60 mph and the Sail Fish at 68 mph. Here is a claim from Barbados that a brief fish was clocked at 55 mph?

Well maybe, but not if Gale Ivan has everything to say about it as if that fish pops out of the water it is accountable to be doing some 135 mph inside a few feet of leave-taking the waters appear and might be carried by the wind for quite a while too? Now that would absolutely be a new record.

Does this mean we might also wish to look at Fish and Sea Life Evolution in the smooth designs of aircraft, UAVs, Blimps and Olympic Swim Gear? Yes, this is one of the points of this dialogue. Does this mean we ought to look at aviation designs for submarine, AUVs, ship hulls and below the surface submersibles? Be supposed to we also be manipulative flooded bases for aircraft, spaceship and bend in half use vessels? Airborne AUVs, which develop into UAVs? Crafty fleeting torpedoes, Mechanical Fish and MAVs, which look like the airborne fish photo too? Yes, it does. If you made a mechanical fish what good would it be? Hunting water mines, data relays, added net-centric contact unit?

http://worldthinktank. net/wttbbs/index. php?showtopic=218

If character can do these things, so can we and we have been constantly re-designing and bettering natures methods. If an eagle has 3-4 beat times the eye sight and can see, react and adapt while in-flight that quickly, yet has less of a brain to coordinate all the data yet has also residential triple the reflex or rejoinder time, ought to we be looking into how this is done? For case in point does an Eagle use some sort of visual frame bursting, for case it knows the type of fish it likes to eat which tastes good and is the right authority and size and when it sees this it's brain fills in the minutiae and it's eyes only focus on the affront variations of activity and assign so it knows where to pick it up at and how best to filch it out of the water? We know that our brains use up about 45% of the brain capability in visual cognition. What does the Eagle do with all the many flights and all that data for it's memory, it cannot probably store it all, does it have a Arbitrary Approach Remembrance Data dump like when you windows cpu crashes? Does it only save the frames and basic shapes and let the eyes fill in the rest of the information each time? We be supposed to test this as it is central to know.

We know the human brain can be fooled often a sufficient amount when amazing appears to be close to a touch we are accustomed with. What can we learn from these birds above and beyond their aerodynamics. Is it feasible to play optical tricks on an Eagle? For case make a small AUV, which mimics a salmon fish? Will the Eagle be fooled by this? Old Eagle eyes, or will the Eagles brilliant eye sight trigger a further wave in it's brain, as if to ask itself; "Hey amazing is fishy about that fish?" Would such a brain wave from an Eagle considerably activate it's brain for a be with look, ahead of diving upon it's prey? It appears in humans this does activate an added brain wave.

Since Eagles do not flock are do they commune and navigate, migrate using ELF, knotted brains with other eagles? Only their close families from the same look after or nest? This too would be of value for influential AI for mechanized UAVs as part of the net centric conflict situation.

As we look at Fake Aptitude models perchance we must be looking at other species, which seem to be able to do more with less. Less brain capacity, yet still think. Perchance we ought to dump the ego into idea that mankind is the only beast which can aim and adapt on this Planet, we have big proof of other animals here doing quite fine in the belief region. If we open our minds we may find other species may in fact supercede our abilities in many aspects. Is the forthcoming of robotics going to the birds with regards to UAVs and MAVs as the needs of mankind and the competitiveness of the species looks towards innovation as the crucial contest and in our speed to accomplish we find ourselves bettering hundreds of thousands of years of evolution with breach after break through?

Robots to exceedingly assist us must have some fuzzy logic capabilities at least amount and to be most actual they must also have some false aptitude capabilities to serve our needs, as mankind has no end in sight to the tasks it requests to assign to mechanized apparatuses.

Press-on will solve all that mankind desires. There are clues in all places and one might ask what is attractive us so long anyway, where would you like to go today? We need to ratchet up the accepted wisdom here and move ahead in this arena.

"Lance Winslow" - If you have innovative judgment and exceptional perspectives, come think with Lance; www. WorldThinkTank. net/wttbbs


White Coats, Black Scientists  Harvard Business Review

NAS and NAM Presidents Alarmed By Political Interference in Science Amid Pandemic  The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

News at a glance  Science

Trump lied about science

What Is Math? | Science  Smithsonian Magazine

Climate at the National Academies  National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Developed by:
home | site map © 2020